Hi! I m looking into possible topics for my bachelors dissertation and among these topics is the relationships and coordination (or lack thereof) between private security resources and government resources. This could be in the form of joint exercises, emergency response agreements or voluntary contributions by the security industry during a crisis, or any other form of agreement or cooperation.
Basically any information regarding the success or failures of such interactions as well as any assessments regarding the viability of such relationships and similar is of value. If anyone on here has any information on these topics I would very much appreciate it if you could share it. Any links you could provide would also be immensely useful. While I m primarily interested in articles and sources that can be cited in an academic article I m also very interested in your personal opinions on the matter as well as any relevant information on the topic, so please don t be shy about sharing! Thanks!
Originally posted here: Cooperation between government and private security assets
HART is looking to expand its pool of experts with a specialty in conflict prevention and resolution, if you have the following experience. Emergency/post emergency support needs assessment Monitoring/observing cease-fire/peace accords and agreements Demobilisation, Disarmament and Reintegration (DDR) Rehabilitation of social and economic infrastructures Conflict prevention, conflict-sensitivity and human security Needs assessments and context-specific analysis for support to security sector and development of benchmarks. Conflict Risk Assessment, Analysis and Post-conflict transition plans.
For more information follow the link below.
Conflict Prevention and Resolution Experts. – PALADIN JOBS
View article: Conflict Prevention and Resolution Experts.
I’m grand with the rest of my law degree but one question gets me, I don’t know what to say… outline the role of the judiciary in the legal system, identify one argument for and against the contention that judges create law… My answer is Our law is a combination of legislation (created by parliament in the form of statutes) and common law (created when Judges interpret the law and add further definition to it.
Sometimes this is called “case law.” A good eg is the Offences Against the Person Act 1861. The parliament-made legislation sets out the main criminal offences of assault, battery, ABH and GBH. However, the meaning of “assault” has been interpreted by judges in various cases over the years e.g. R v Ireland, Burstow (1997). Some criminal offences aren’t set out in any legislation e.g. Murder, which is a common law offence – there is no piece of legislation which states that it is an offence to murder someone. Instead, the offence of murder was created by judges in how they interpreted general law and custom.
Id like your input.
This really has me stumped.
Read the original post: