Purchase a Newspaper + Premium Digital subscription for
14.50 per week *
All the benefits of Premium Digital, plus:
- Free delivery to your home or office, Monday to Saturday
- FT Weekend – a stimulating blend of news and lifestyle
If airport security measures weren t uncomfortable enough, TSA recently revealed they re making pat down procedures a little more invasive . A spokesperson told Bloomberg, I would say people who in the past would have gotten a pat-down that wasn t involved will notice that the new pat-down is more involved.
The TSA has warned airport officials, crew, and law enforcement that the new procedure may involve an officer making more intimate contact than before . If CNN correspondent Angela Rye s recent experience is any indication, yeah, the new procedure does sound a lot more involved2. The TSA doesn t get very detailed on what the new procedure will look like, but the Airports Council International-North America (ACI-NA) sent a security notice to members that offered a vague description, according to Bloomberg:
Now security screeners will use the front of their hands on a passenger in a private screening area if one of the prior screening methods indicates the presence of explosives, according to a security notice that the Airports Council International-North America (ACI-NA) sent its U.S . members following a March 1 conference call with TSA official. The TSA website doesn t give you much to go on3 in terms of options, either . They simply say: At any time during the process, you may request private screening accompanied by a companion of your choice . A second officer of the same gender will always be present during private screening.
Not very comforting, considering it s the same procedure, just in private. According to LegalMatch4, rejecting a pat down altogether will likely get you booted from the airport . It s worth noting that if you reject the full-body scanner, you ll get a pat down instead . That said, you can still get a pat down if you go through the full-body scanner. (Also, TSA can still reject your request5 if you d rather have a pat down and a scan, so that s not even necessarily an option). If you want to avoid a pat down, here s what one TSA agent told Reader s Digest6:
Don t wear shirts or pants with extraneous pockets, buttons, or zippers, or anything with sequined bling on it . These items tend to appear suspicious on the scanner, which is programmed to flag anything out of the ordinary. Of course, don t look suspicious is pretty ridiculous advice, but the TSA isn t exactly flexible, and their policies seem to only be getting more aggressive . If nothing else, these new procedures are something to be aware of next time you fly .
For more detail, head to the links below.
- ^ weren t uncomfortable enough, (lifehacker.com)
- ^ the new procedure does sound a lot more involved (www.cnn.com)
- ^ TSA website doesn t give you much to go on (www.tsa.gov)
- ^ According to LegalMatch (www.legalmatch.com)
- ^ TSA can still reject your request (www.latimes.com)
- ^ TSA agent told Reader s Digest (www.rd.com)
- ^ TSA Warns Local Police About Its New Airport Pat-Downs (www.bloomberg.com)
- ^ Consumerist (consumerist.com)
While the world watched the US refuse entry to Muslims1 on Saturday, President Donald Trump restructured his National Security Council in a move that further empowered Steve Bannon2, his increasingly influential White House consigliere. Mr Trump issued a presidential memorandum which stated that the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, the top military adviser to the president, and the director of national intelligence, head of the intelligence community, would no longer be automatically invited to meetings of the principals committee, the most senior grouping of national security officials . They would participate only when issues pertaining to their responsibilities and expertise are to be discussed . But in a move that pointed to the rising influence of Mr Bannon, the former head of the far-right Breitbart News media group was appointed to the committee . Mr Bannon joined the Trump campaign as chief executive last August . The move was controversial because the former Goldman Sachs 3banker ran a media group that pushed stories catering to white nationalists . Mr Bannon has denied that he is racist, arguing that he is just an economic nationalist . But the disheveled former naval officer who compares himself to Darth Vader has drawn the wrath of critics who see his hand guiding Mr Trump s racially tinged populism. The administration just added Steve Bannon with his ties to a news organisation that traffics in anti-Semitism and white supremacy to the National Security Council
Mr Bannon s role in helping the New York businessman win the election by letting Trump be Trump has made him ever more influential . Including Mr Bannon in the most senior NSC meetings makes him arguably one of the two most influential aides in the Trump inner circle, along with Jared Kushner, the president s son-in-law . The other key power centres inside the White House are Mike Pence, the vice-president, Kellyanne Conway, a special adviser and informal spokesperson, and Reince Priebus, the chief of staff.
When Mr Trump appointed James Mattis4, a respected retired four-star marine general, as secretary of defence, and tapped John Kelly, another retired general, to run the homeland security department, some of his critics saw the moves as a sign that he would surround himself with experienced people . But Democrats lambasted the decision to give Mr Bannon, who has no government or national security experience, such a prominent role . He was recently criticised for describing the media as the opposition party , a view to which Mr Trump subscribes. Tim Kaine, the Virginia senator who served as Hillary Clinton s running mate, said he had voted for Mr Mattis and Mr Kelly because of the importance of the NSC, and castigated the decision to give Mr Bannon such an influential position . The National Security Council sadly has some really questionable people on it . The national security adviser, General Michael Flynn, is a pro-Russian conspiracy theorist . The administration just added Steve Bannon with his ties to a news organisation that traffics in anti-Semitism and white supremacy to the National Security Council. Susan Rice, former national security adviser to Barack Obama, described the move to exclude the DNI and the chairman of the joint chiefs from some meetings as stone cold crazy . On Twitter, she continued: After a week of crazy .
Who needs military advice or intell to make policy on Isil, Syria, Afghanistan, DPRK? Related article
Tim Cook and other tech leaders speak out amid concern over attack on values associated with Silicon Valley
Monday, 30 January, 2017
As part of the NSC, the principals committee includes the secretaries of state, defence and homeland security . It is one of the most powerful groupings since it serves as the forum where cabinet secretaries debate national security issues for presidential action. Sean Spicer5, White House spokesman, said Mr Trump wanted to make the NSC less bureaucratic and more focused on providing relevant intelligence. Asked on ABC television why Mr Bannon was being put on the committee, Mr Spicer said he was a former naval officer with a tremendous understanding of the world and the geopolitical landscape that we have now . During the Obama administration, and particularly during the tenure of Ms Rice as national security adviser, the NSC was often criticised for holding endless meetings to debate issues, which resulted in delayed decisions on policy. Eric Edelman, a Republican who served as the number three official in the Pentagon during the administration of George W Bush, said that while Mr Bannon appeared to have played a large role in the first week of the Trump administration, it was too early to draw conclusions, given that many cabinet officers including Rex Tillerson, the former chief executive of ExxonMobil nominated for secretary of state had not yet been confirmed or installed. Mr Edelman said Mr Bannon s NSC role was not unlike Mr Obama allowing senior political advisers such as David Axelrod to attend meetings . He said Mr Bush did not involve Karl Rove, his closest political adviser, in the NSC to avoid the appearance of allowing politics to be involved in national security . But he pointed out that top political aides tend to play a bigger role during the period that administrations are being formulated.
Over time it is not at all clear they continue to play that equally important role . The balance of power can shift quite a bit over time, said Mr Edelman . People want to jump to gigantic conclusions here but that is probably not warranted yet.
Follow Demetri Sevastopulo and Sam Fleming on Twitter: @dimi and @sam1fleming
Sample the FT s top stories for a week
You select the topic, we deliver the news.